Emersonian Person Essays - Lecturers, Transcendentalism, Mystics

Emersonian Person The most Emersonian person that I have ever known would be with out a doubt be Frederick Jones. I spent two summers working with this man on the Linville River for the Kawana fishing club. In Self Reliance Emerson writes Your genuine action will explain itself and will explain your other genuine actions. Your conformity explains nothing. This is clearly a call for individuality in men. Though Frederick has probably never read or even heard of Ralph Waldo Emerson, his way of life is very much in line with what Emerson claims will be the only true way to inner peace. Frederick is very much a mystery to the people of Linville, and except for those who know him best, he is not very well liked. He quit school after the eight grade, yet he is one of the most intelligent people I have ever known. Like Emerson, Frederick believes that all he needs to know and understand is with in himself. He claims to have no regret for quitting school. His argument is that once he learned to read and write, what he did with those skills should be at his discretion. Frederick is a wealthy man, but very few people know to what extent. His beat up Ford truck and old work cloths suggest nothing more that a simple working man. In fact this is exactly what he is. Frederick has a reputation for having little to say except for when the issue concerns him, but he is also know for speaking his mind and standing up for himself regardless of the consequence. Like most people he loathes taxes, but it is not so much the money that bothers him as it is what he sees to be criminal waste of his money. His feelings on giving money to the poor are much the same as Emersons: ... do not tell as a good man did today of my obligation to put all good men into good situations. Are they my poor?(553) If it were up to Frederick, there would not be a dime of him money spent on welfare. I used to wonder why a man in his financial situation would subject himself to such a life of labor. I finally asked him on one of the hottest days of the summer while were chain sawing a trail through a Rhododendrem jungle. All he said was it keeps me alive. It was only then that I began to see what that river means to him. Having lost his family to a car accident, that seven mile stretch of river is his only source peace. Later in that summer while we were walking down the river bank he said Out here things are real. These trout, these mountains, this river-there is no bull *censored*, and that is one thing I hate-bull *censored*. Frederick is a man who depends on no one, and expects nothing. He says what he feels, and he makes no apology when he offends. Emerson states my life is not an apology, but a life (553) This is precisely how Frederick lives, and it is for this reason that he is not loved by the masses. In his defense, Frederick is genuine. He is a man that can be taken at face value, and people always know where they stand with him. It is not that Frederick trys to hurt or belittle people, but he has a reputation for calling situations as he sees them. He once told me the truth is often a lot more painful than a lie, but life is to short for lies. Most would agree that tact is not his strong point, but having spent time with him all I can honestly say it is not his strong point because it is not important to him. For Frederick integrity is the most important thing a man can have. In the time that I spent with him I never heard him do or say anything to suggest that he is not perfectly content with himself. Emerson writes every great man is unique(565) With consistency that I have seen from no other man, Frederick believes in himself, and that truly is unique. He is not a man that judges others opinions as wrong, simply different. Emersons position that No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature(552) is exactly the way Frederick lives his life. He is known for holding on to his principles regardless of outside opinion. Because of the

First Anglo-Afghan War, 1839-1842

First Anglo-Afghan War, 1839-1842 During the nineteenth century, two large European empires vied for dominance in Central Asia. In what was called the Great Game, the Russian Empire moved south while the British Empire moved north from its so-called crown jewel, colonial India. Their interests collided in Afghanistan, resulting in the First Anglo-Afghan War of 1839 to 1842. Background to the First Anglo-Afghan War In the years leading up to this conflict, both the British and Russians approached Afghanistans Emir Dost Mohammad Khan, hoping to form an alliance with him. Britains Governor-General of India, George Eden (Lord Auckland), grew extremely concerned with he heard that a Russian envoy had arrived in Kabul in 1838; his agitation increased when talks broke down between the Afghan ruler and the Russians, signaling the possibility of a Russian invasion. Lord Auckland decided to strike first in order to forestall a Russian attack. He justified this approach in a document known as the Simla Manifesto of October 1839. The manifesto states that in order to secure a trustworthy ally to the west of British India, British troops would enter Afghanistan to support Shah Shuja in his attempts to retake the throne from Dost Mohammad. The British werent invading Afghanistan, according to Auckland- just helping out a deposed friend and preventing foreign interference (from Russia). The British Invade Afghanistan In December of 1838, a British East India Company force of 21,000 mainly Indian troops began to march northwest from Punjab. They crossed the mountains in the dead of winter, arriving at Quetta, Afghanistan in March of 1839. The British easily captured Quetta and Qandahar and then routed Dost Mohammads army in July. The emir fled to Bukhara via Bamyan, and the British reinstalled Shah Shuja on the throne thirty years after he had lost it to Dost Mohammad. Well satisfied with this easy victory, the British withdrew, leaving 6,000 troops to prop up Shujas regime. Dost Mohammad, however, was not ready to give up so easily, and in 1840 he mounted a counter-attack from Bukhara, in what is now Uzbekistan. The British had to rush reinforcements back into Afghanistan; they managed to capture Dost Mohammad and brought him to India as a prisoner. Dost Mohammads son, Mohammad Akbar, began to rally Afghan fighters to his side in the summer and autumn of 1841 from his base in Bamyan. Afghan discontent with the continued presence of foreign troops mounted, leading to the assassination of Captain Alexander Burnes and his aides in Kabul on November 2, 1841; the British did not retaliate against the mob that killed Captain Burnes, encouraging further anti-British action. Meanwhile, in an effort to soothe his angry subjects, Shah Shuja made the fateful decision that he no longer needed British support. General William Elphinstone and the 16,500 British and Indian troops on Afghan soil agreed to begin their withdrawal from Kabul on January 1, 1842. As they made their way through the winter-bound mountains toward Jalalabad, on January 5th a contingent of Ghilzai (Pashtun) warriors attacked the ill-prepared British lines. The British East India troops were strung out along the mountain path, struggling through two feet of snow. In the melee that followed, the Afghans killed almost all of the British and Indian soldiers and camp followers. A small handful was taken, prisoner. The British doctor William Brydon famously managed to ride his injured horse through the mountains and report the disaster to British authorities in Jalalabad. He and eight captured prisoners were the only ethnic British survivors out of about 700 who set out from Kabul. Just a few months after the massacre of Elphinstones army by Mohammad Akbars forces, the new leaders agents assassinated the unpopular and now defenseless Shah Shuja. Furious about the massacre of their Kabul garrison, the British East India Company troops in Peshawar and Qandahar marched on Kabul, rescuing several British prisoners and burning down the Great Bazaar in retaliation. This further enraged the Afghans, who set aside ethnolinguistic differences and united to drive the British out of their capital city. Lord Auckland, whose brain-child the original invasion had been, next concocted a plan to storm Kabul with a much larger force and establish permanent British rule there. However, he had a stroke in 1842 and was replaced as Governor-General of India by Edward Law, Lord Ellenborough, who had a mandate to restore peace to Asia. Lord Ellenborough released Dost Mohammad from prison in Calcutta without fanfare, and the Afghan emir retook his throne in Kabul. Consequences of the First Anglo-Afghan War Following this great victory over the British, Afghanistan maintained its independence and continued to play the two European powers off of each other for three more decades. In the meantime, the Russians conquered much of Central Asia up to the Afghan border, seizing what is now Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan. The people of what is now Turkmenistan were the last vanquished by the Russians, at the Battle of Geoktepe in 1881. Alarmed by the tsars expansionism, Britain kept a wary eye on Indias northern borders. In 1878, they would invade Afghanistan once again, sparking the Second Anglo-Afghan War. As for the people of Afghanistan, the first war with the British reconfirmed their distrust of foreign powers and their intense dislike of foreign troops on Afghan soil. British army chaplain Reverand G.R. Gleig wrote in 1843 that the First Anglo-Afghan War was begun for no wise purpose, carried on with a strange mixture of rashness and timidity, [and] brought to a close after suffering and disaster, without much glory attached either to the government which directed, or the great body of troops which waged it. It seems safe to assume that Dost Mohammad, Mohammad Akbar, and the majority of Afghan people were much better pleased by the outcome.